Feminist Principles

Andreas difficulties and b differents in her two worlds show that she could not subject to perform her duties, obligations, plans, and goals in her spirit. The main sheer about Andrea is that she cherished to have both worlds having a perfect family and a boffo line of achievement. However, this became her shadow of nefariousness because both of these worlds vex right through her hands. That is why the nearly basic military position that happened to Andrea is to become milder with her situation as a person, a mother, a wife, and a c atomic number 18er muliebrity.1. Andreas marriage is merely the basic problem in this context. Her family and career life united together to ruin her identity and identity element as a woman. Her conserve did not support her anxieties and problems that occurred within her. That is why it behind be said that her match was a non- doweryicipant in her situation. When marital arrangements are unfair in terms of power and decision-making , and family unit workloads are unevenly distributed, women continue to be disadvantaged (Worrel and Remer, 182). In opposition to what Andrea is difficult to testify, she thought that she was discriminated and disadvantaged because she did not earn what she think is for her. These issues are part of Andreas organism and tangled situations. However, found on Andreas description of her present scenario, it back tooth be seen that marriage for her in the author is not a major infringe for her goals and aspiration because she sets a status the inescapably of her partner for the thinking that he is just in that respect by her side but her career could not wait.It is then a excuse that Andrea tried so enceinte to turn over the friendly idea or archetype towards women. Nevertheless, she became unsuccessful because she herself could not adapted to sabotage the speech pattern and difficulties that she currently experiencing. T here are several factors emerged to Andreas tactual sensation her in-personity, her family, her career, and her accessible purlieu. All of these issues are part of her belief that led her to uncontrollable weeping. Based on my own observation, I have seen iii main issues that should be addressed to Andreas situation.First, her person-to-personity she treasured to level herself with the situation of her husband. In the field of Women Studies, it was said that women from the knightly and up to this generation are all the same behind or beneath men. Andrea cherished to deconstruct this idea so she strived hard to achieve her goal. However, nothing has change in the rules of order because like Andreas case, the fresh society still put women at the bottom of mens triumph and female prejudice. Second, her goals and plans in life she wanted to aim and live higher than what she ineluctably to expect.She wanted perfection to be able to gain power. She is in need of self-complacency to be able to prove that she has th e potentiality to be more than what other women can. The low rate of positive outcomes is assumed to publication in increasingly passive manner and dysphoric mood, as the individual feels incapable of r each(prenominal)ing personal goals and reacts with withdrawal and despair (Ibid, 184). Because of these factors, she became focused to her self-perfection and blinded by her personal plans and goals in life.Lastly, her social environment because she wanted to pursue the standard of the society, she tends to forget that clarified details of her life. She transferred her mind into a notion that she can disregard her be a mother for a while because she is in the level of her success in her job. 2. womens rightist Principles and therapy willing help Andrea to understand the primal factors in her situation as a woman. This is to puzzle Andrea understand why she is experiencing difficulties in life that brought failure to her individuality as woman and a wife.The outmatch ar ticle of belief that can be used towards Andreas issues is the Egalitarian relationship. This principle helps her to tell apart the differences of being a man and a woman in a society. This is also to recognize how a person is capable of being what she truly wanted despite of the dictations of the society towards or against her. However, the main conflict here is that the relationship between Andrea and her husband that cannot be avoided by Andrea because her husband is not part of her growth and circumstances.In advocating egalitarian nodecounselor relationships and counselor self-disclosure, Empowerment womens rightist Therapy embraces a female perspective on the therapeutic process that conflicts with many beliefs of tralatitious therapies which are based on sort male values ( womens rightist Transformation and steering Theories, 95). 3. Based on my understanding to Andreas situation and the cognitive-behavioral procedures, the most relevant among all the procedures are th e coping skills, self-instructions, and stress inoculation. These troika procedures are the best ways to develop Andrea become more comfortable with her situation.Because life is always a changing world, it shows that Andreas life and environment also changes. It besides means that coping-skills, self-instructions, and stress inoculation will let Andrea feel her true side her identity and the ways on how to relief the pain that she continue to comprehend. In coping skills, Andrea can have the understanding how she has gone(a) through her life. She needfully to strengthen her feelings and ideology to become aware of the things in her environment to be able to accept the facts of life. In self-instruction, Andrea inevitably to choose her path with freedom.She require to accelerate her mind and thoughts towards her obligations and purpose in life not on what she necessitate to become. In stress inoculation, Andrea needs to insure that stress builds all her anxieties in life . Therefore, to be able to recover from extreme stress that she experienced, she needs to be vaccinated with favorable ambiance and aura coming from other people and her environment. 4. Because Andreas husband is a non-participant of her situation, it is a ample circumstance or problem for her. However, the main thing that needs to consider is the need to know Andreas wholeness.The most basic thing that needs to construct in Andreas life is her being. It is more important that making her husband capable of knowing her as a wife and a woman. Women are much unaware of how their automatic thoughts and behaviors are influence and maintained by the gender-driven expectations of others (Ibid, 185). It is true as what Worrel and Remer said in their research. Therefore, it is important to make Andrea feel that despite of her husbands criticism and being a non-participant, she needs to move her life and exit from the darkness of stress and defeat. 5.I can say that based on Worell and Re mers model of interpellation, the best crisis discourse approach that fits to women who experience depression is the conflicted interpersonal behavior because it is a immense range that talks about the social conflicts and beings of a person within her environment. Feminist Principles become included in this crisis intervention because it gives the probability to gain the strength and brisk identity of women during their extreme stress. As the feminist principles work, the crisis intervention will make each understanding reliable and conducive to the patient.For me, the crisis intervention that might not fit is the existent burden because this is not really a problem at all because big percentage of women are already immutable because of their husband or partner. Therefore, it is less blackmail for women to think of their finances rather than their personal needs and achievements. References Worrel and Remer. (date). Feminist Perspective in Therapy. pp. 171-194. (date). A Fem inist View of charge and Therapy. pp. 91-134.